>In where? The COM object?

I think so, we did that WWWC stuff before I knew what a COM was. We basically ripped the DEFINE CLASS out of your samples and changed the function names. I never went back to see what was actually going on. It could be a COM or not.

>>Could that too though, correct?
>Pardon?

That could change too, though, correct? (I forgot what I was talking about though)