>>Well, that's unfortunate. Then, why is there an option to encrypt the EXE, if decompilers can still decode it?
>>
>>>Sorry no, you can brand an executable with Refox but this only stops Refox from decompiling.
>
>It makes it "human" unreadable. (Like it wasn't before???) :)

Well then... if ENCRYPT does not protect the source, and ReFox only brands EXEs to prevent ITSELF from decompiling it, is there a way to ensure proprietary rights to the application? Or, is that, in a nutshell, the whole reason for seemingly worthless copyright law?

Michael