>>>>>Caught you snoozin' :-)
>>>>
>>>>Nope! Had to look the news article number up.:-)
>>>
>>>Well, I had to wade through *tons* of old messages -- searched on "divide zero" first since Jan, then July-Dec 99 -- found plenty of messages that said "there's a patch somewhere", found a link that was broken, then finally found a good one. You should have taken the more direct approach like I did :-)
>>
>>Maybe so. Just one question, are you sure that's a good link?
>
>You could have just clicked on it to try it :-) I *always* check links before posting them -- doesn't everyone?

Yeah, I know. I was just trying to give you a hard time because you beat me.< g >