>>Much cleaner and shorter than my routine. Care if I "borrow" it?
>
>Not at all...it actually was much shorter at first, but needed a lot of additional calculations to factor in the Y2K and other centuries leap year and non-leap years...let me know if you find any flaws in it, it's a fairly tricky algorithm, as I'm sure you know...

Will do! I'm almost ashamed to post it, but do you want to see my routine for purposes of comparison?