I did send them an e-mail about the incorrect link reference in the Distributed article. The reference to the Desktop article is incorrect. They listed it as fea2main.asp instead of fea3main.asp.
>What do both of you think about the reviews. The distributed seemed have more in depth research. The desktop review didn't even mention the fox wiki.
>
>>Looks like VFP is still alive and well! The leap from the annoying
Is VFP Dead Threads to complaining about publication lag time in very positive VFP articles is most encouraging. I stand by my tag line links. :^)
>>
>>>I hate seeing things like "Current status: Expected to be released in February" in something that is published in mid March. It always bugs me when magazines print "old news" because of the lag time to publication. I hoped e-zines would help with this, but maybe not!
>>>
>>>
>>>>Check out the reviews on the VFP exams.
>>>>
>>>>
http://www.mcpmag.com/members/00apr/fea3main.asp>>>>
http://www.mcpmag.com/members/00apr/oe2main.asp
Mark McCasland
Midlothian, TX USA