Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Is VFP (6, SP3) inherently slower than FPD (2.6a)
Message
De
17/03/2000 21:33:10
 
 
À
16/03/2000 23:48:47
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Autre
Divers
Thread ID:
00346811
Message ID:
00347384
Vues:
22
Hi Al,

SNIP

>
>Are you sure the clock(s) are reporting accurately? Maybe you could run enough iterations to yield 10 seconds or so and check the times against a stopwatch, just to make sure they're in the right ballpark.
>
Well I finally got around to doing this and reported times match the clock elapsed times in both cases. It was 5,000,000 loops and FPD took 11.5sec while VFP took 22.5 sec.
Which is unfortunate because I had suspected the time reporting after hearing of the difference between Win9x and NT.

Reminder: more a point of interest than a problem.

I will keep chewing on it and watching for reasoning.

Cheers

Jim N


SNIP
Précédent
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform