>I'd say that the current behavior of GOMONTH() in regard to the year of 1753
>is not warranted, and not documented (does this qualify it as a bug?), and
>that it should behave like all other date math calculations in FP/VFP – i.e.
>happily go back to 1 Mar 0000.
Well, I don't know if it qualifies as a bug, but it's been pointed out. :-)