>WSH is part of Windows 2000. With prior OS's, the WSH needs to be installed. I have tested WSH with Windows 2000 and NT, and it works fine. I don't see why WSH would not work with Win98 or Win95.
>

Actually, WSH 1.0 was pretty much a part of base Win98, since you had to really work at it to not get it installed along with the rest of IE 4...and it's completely unavoidable with SE. Aside from Win 3.x with the completely unsupported Win32s extension (which could only run VFP3 apps IAC), unupdated retail Win95 installs (which have other, infinitely larger problems, like a complete lack of Y2K compliance and a ton of bugs) and WinNT 4.0 that is forced to stay below the level of NT SP3, WSH should be installable using the self-extracting, freely redistributable WSH executable from the MS Scripting site.

>>John, et al,
>>
>>As someone who hasn't fooled with WSH I'm wondering about a couple things and maybe the answers will help shed a little more light on this great thread.
>>
>>What kind of issues are there with WSH vis a vis VFP with respect to OS compatibilities and so forth. Does WSH only work on W2K & NT & W98 but not W95 and stuff like that. If I had a client that contracted with me for a solution what are the practical management issues I'd need to think about?
>>
>>If I were to draw a circle that represented the whole useful spectrum of VFP and draw one for WSH where would the overlaps and non-overlaps be? That's what I'd want to know in order to be able to most effectively choose which should be use d when.
>>
>>Best,
>>
>>DD