Exactly my point about getting the info elsewhere. I currently use Web Connect and anything I've seen Rick discuss in FPA can be found in WC (or its help file)or in a white paper on his site.

So unfortunately, there's not enough content to justify a subscription. Much like I find Cristof Lange to be one of the most knowledgeable and helpful people around. Yet I find the UT good enough that I don't feel a loss at the lack of Cristof. Anything that is of good quality in FPA can be found elsewhere and better.

PF

>Hi Perry..
>
>I am sure amongst the crap, you will see some good stuff in FPA. Anything by Rick is worth reading, and he has some good stuff coming in future issues. His last one on PDF files was a gem. However, the fact that still remains is that 80-90% of the magazine is crap. Why? The editorial direction, or lack thereof, has been misguided at best. Look at the pathetic posts up here by the editorial regime and you begin to see what I mean.
>
>About the only thing the editorial board of FPA knows about WSH, COM, and ADO is how to spell the acronyms. After that, it is a total crap-shoot....