>George,
>As I replied to Nadya, I really didn't mean this to get out of hand. I just re-read Ed's reply to me & got more angry than I should have done over his comment about doing myself a favour & looking at his code.
>
>I'm not trying to set myself up as an expert on how things should be done & to that extent, I would prefer not to go into detail, that would only cause more arguments/discussions, my involvement in this thread only started with a flippant comment. (But there were one or two issues I felt with use of an array as a data structure, which needed better commenting & use of defines to aid readability & maintainability of the code, but that's just how I would do it, I work as part of a team & other people spend a lot of time looking at my code. I don't know if it's different for Ed.)
>
>There are many ways of doing things & I am not saying I am right or that Ed was wrong, just that he was wrong to tell me to do myself a favor by looking at his code.
>
Paul,

I kind of got that feeling.

At any rate, the point of my post was to get this moving in a positive direction. The exchange of POVs is always positive provided that the objective reasoning behind it is explained in an objective fashion. To one say something is either good or bad, helps no one. To say why, benefits all.