>
>Ok that's fair. I thought that you were submitting content to FPA from other posts. If you are that's great.


I am. But if you have ever dealt with Advisor before, you know that there is not much and often NO money involved. Even if I get paid, it's not like I would get residuals. Monetarily, I could care less if they were next to bankrupt.

>I felt that FPA was beginner content. They are the same price becasue one gives you the code, the other you have to buy it as an add on. In the end very close in $ for the final product.

I thought that the code would be useful to me at first, but to be honest, I have never downloaded a bit of it. Copied from the printed samples, yes. But realistically, the downloads are of no extra value to me, so I appreciate having the choice of whether or not to pay for them.

>What if they provided content of the articles 3 or months after publisihing? I think that they wine about paying the writers more money. So it's all about the writers and screw the readers?

Not sure what you mean here, but they sure aren't going out of their way to compensate the writers. The document on their website states that in general, your name on the article and a short bio is considered adequate compensation.

>I guess that I'll find more real time info here.

Probably. But what you get won't be exhaustive.