Ed,

>Walter, your ethical system is, from my POV, serious flawed.

You'll know by know I don't care much off your POV, to me your POV is always being right even if you aren't. Be just a good guy and admit it when you're wrong.

>You lack the intellectual integrity to post statements in the context in which the statements were made. Your criticism of JVP is unwarranted. You've completely failed to explain in any way, shape, or form the failings of John's feelings of disappointment in and disapproval of FPA's direction and quality of content.

Again, I'm not referring to the actual contents of the post, but to the emotional rudness and insulting which JVP tends to put in his posts. I don't care less about what JVP has to say about FPA. With the rudeness hidden in the message the whole message has losts it's value. If he ommited the rudeness I would not have regarded this message as crap.

>I'll not ask you to do me any favors. I'd ask anyone who feels a need to respond to this simple statement of complete disgust and disrepect for whatever you attempt to pass off as intellectual contribution to the community to examine your efforts and motives, and give you the full measure of credit you've earned by your past efforts.

My contribution is not the topic of discussion, rudeness OTOH is. I'm fully aware I'd never reach the level of contribution you or JVP did earn. BUT THIS DOES NOT GIVE YOU THE RIGHT TO BE RUDE TO EVERYONE WHO DISAGREES WITH YOU and this does not take away that there are proven cases WHERE YOU DID NOT ADMIT WHERE YOU WERE WRONG AND REACTED IN RUDENESS.

>You're already following the correct course of action by active pursuit of self-examination, it's just that most of us examine our thoughts and beliefs rather than the interior anatomy of our lower digestive tracts.

I don't have clue what you're saying here, but i'll take that as an compliment.

My allergic reaction has passed away, but I'll expect it will come back with the next rudeness attack from either you or JVP.

Take care,

Walter,