>
You've insulted Tamar's professionally, deprecated her degree, her excellent book, and belittled the thousands of hours she has spent helping people. Tamar doesn't owe anybody anything.
>

No I did not... I asked some questions, and did not get complete answers.

>I've got news for you: She can out-sql you. She can out-report-writer you. She can out-automate you. She can out-syntax you, she can out-write I'll bet she can out-code you too. I also suspect she out-community-services you and out-parents you too. She definitely out-classes you by a wide margin.
>

Gee, a little bias here??? Even if any of this was true, you have no basis to make any of these conclusions. In short, these comments by your are totally irrelevant.

>
Also, I was sitting near you in a bar in Orlando and I distinctly remember you uttering the word a-hole about someone, don't deny it, so you owe Meester an apology too.
>

You see, this is where you come of as an idiot. Yes, I called you a name. Now, be sure to cry boo-hoo... Let's see, I called somebody an A-hole in a bar 2 devcons ago because you say I did. And, you tell me not to deny it.

OK, may I cross-examine...

What was the context of the discussion?
Who did I call an A-Hole
Who was I sitting with?
Were you drinking?
What was the name of the bar?
Perhaps you were impaired that night??

Do you think I have poked enough holes in this one....

FWIW, I don't owe Meester bubkis... The context of calling somebody was the UT.

Andre, again, when it comes to formulating arguments, having basis with which to make conclusions, you fall short of the mark. You bring emotion into your thoughts. And, it is that sort of irrational thinking that is your undoing.

If I do have an issue with Advisor and the editorial direction of the magazine, why do you insist on putting yourself in the middle of the discussion? Tamar does not need you to be here self-proclaimed knight in shining armor.