A few points..

1. It is Petersen, not Peterson..

2. If you have not read the rules, it makes it a bit hard for you to make the
assertion that any of us are in violation. You opinion and POV is
essentially invalidated.

3. As for lack of respect, I would suggest you direct your comments to Meester
Nelson, and Payette. When it comes to personal bashing, those three are
guilty as charged. Do I at times go over the top, yes. Do I slam somebody
for the sake of slamming them, no. Those three are the ones that are
picking a fight so to speak. They came after me. The discussions I have had
with Tamar in no way breaks any rules on this forum. I challenge you to
prove otherwise. With that in mind, is there any reason why you left Payette
and Nelson off your list.

Next time, have all the facts at hand and try not to be so bias/emotional....

And, FWIW, when Ed and I are involved in a thread, you can bet the Sysops take a good look at the content...< bg >..


>I think that if you take a serious look at the threads that have been started and are continuing on the VFP forum you will see action is needed. In my opinion there is nothing that can come from them, even the original posts that can contribute to the VFP community. I have not and will not claim to have read all of the rule of conduct, but I am sure that there have been many times that they have been broken just within these messages. It is very hard for me to say this, know the excellent input that is given by most or all of the people involved, but I must say it. Once again my opinion is that John Peterson, Ed Raugh, and Walter Meester should be removed from the forum for the conduct within this thread and there complete lack of respect for those who are looking for real assistance and looking to give real assistance to others here.
>
>Thank you,