>So you are saying you make a statement that sounds like you know something for sure, because of an assumption you made based on technical previews on VFP??? Anyone assuming something, should say so, not make it sound like a fact. Remember who said this before?
>

My comments are in the context of designers... What you saw on the project dialog, well, I can't comment on that.....


>I can say for sure that Microsoft intended (note the past, I don't know if they still do it) to add VFP to a project open dialog in some shared Visual Studio environment where you can choose to create different types of VC++, VB and VFP projects. This information was posted on a Microsoft web site and has been discussed here.
>

Again, I cannot comment on this...

>
Picking one example is not a valid method to proof something. Neither is extrapolating something based on a single feature. An ActiveX Designer has *nothing* to do with a shared IDE.
>

What ever you say..

Tell you what, how about a bet..? you take the side that VFP will share the IDE to the same extent as VB/VC, and I will take the other side.

How about $100???