But if the rules are not cast in stone, then I have followed the rules by not enforcing the rules or violating the rules because there is no strict definition of what constitutes the rules.

By saying I violated the rules, you are assuming that hard-wired rules exist. But no one has cleanly defined them yet and that is what is being discussed. Once they have been cast-in-stone, then you could retroactively say I violated them.


>You should probably recuse yourself from any discussions since you violated the rules with which you are charged with enforcing...
>
>>The situation is constantly being discussed. No one wants to be seen as inconsistant.
>>
>>
>>>No.. All I ask is that the sysops be consistient with thier application of the rules and most importantly, not be hypocritical...
>>>
>>>>Because it seems as far as you are concerned, the Sysops are "Damned if we do, Damned if we don't".
>>>>
>>>>Not that your opinion is the only one that matters...