Higher than those that don't think a TE needs to be technically competent..

>Hi John --
>
>What part of "Maybe my standards are just higher..." was generic? Higher than who's? Inquiring minds want to know! Certainly seemed directed *squarely* at the individual to whom you addressed.
>
>Thanks... Karl
>
>
>
>>>
>I think you mis-interpreted my comments. I was not talking about you specifically. Rather, the you I was using was the generic you..< bg >. I think you would do well as a TE. I have seen your posts up here, and I think you know what you are talking about....
>
>Are we cool now....
>
>
>>John,
>>
>>>The stuff always has to be tested. And, a TE does more than just test code. You are over-simplifying the role of the TE.. Maybe my standards are just higher...
><<