John,

>I think you mis-interpreted my comments. I was not talking about you specifically. Rather, the you I was using was the generic you..< bg >.


If what you say is correct, If I wrote a book about a langauge that you knew nothing about or did not have any experience with, are you saying that you could be an effective TE? I don't think so. Surely, you would be at the bottom of the list of candidates that would be qualified to do the job. i.e., you would be my last choice...


>I think you would do well as a TE.

Even if I didn't know the subject matter as in-depth as you said was necessary? My point originally, and now, is that in-depth knowledge of the subject matter is low on the list of qualifications, and I believe I can convincingly prove it to you.

>I have seen your posts up here, and I think you know what you are talking about....

Thanks, but sometimes it's just an illusion, as I mentioned earlier. :-) BTW, I'm still holding out the challenge. I think it would be kinda fun!

>Are we cool now....

Coolly watching the inbox.