In message #350212, Bill Elvin wrote:

 > The "USERS" of a piece of software are not necessarily the ones
 > [footing] the bill for it, so it may not be the case that what the
 > user thinks is the best UI design is what should be programmed...
 > We as developers do have an obligation to make our designs as user-
 > friendly as possible but that obligation is subservient to the
 > obligation to reach the customer’s goals.

Bill: The user is my customer. If the client (the one who pays my fee) wants an app that helps its users do their jobs more effectively, then we'll get along fine. But if they start giving priority to factors other than the user's goals ("We don't have time to put in intelligent error handling; just throw up an error message box and we'll fix it in the next release"), we're going to butt heads. I will try to explain that it's a false economy to "save time" by making software that doesn't serve the users' goals, but if they won't listen to reason (g), I'd rather walk than be complicit in creating bad software. There's plenty of work out there...

<blatant plug>
By the way, anyone who's interested in discussing UI design issues is welcome to visit the design.ui discussion group at DevX.com. Point your newsreader at news://news.devx.com/design.ui, or, if you'd like to experience a user-hostile UI firsthand (g), use our Web interface at http://news.devx.com/cgi-bin/dnewsweb.exe?cmd=xover&group=design.ui.
</blatant plug>
---
Phil Weber
DevX.com, Inc.