It's not just this type of thing I'm talking about. I was watching something on tv. about sexual harrassment. They showed some folks giving a seminar. The gist of the seminar is not to say anything to anyone regarding personal things, type of dress, hair, etc. If the person you are talking to, for whatever reason, decides that something offends them, its good enough for the courts.

I think common sense has gone very far out the window when I can't tell a coworker she looks good today, but Neo-Nazis are allowed to march. Common sense tells me that there's a lot more to worry about than someone making a comment about someone's credentials.

PF

>Perry,
>
>>Has nothing to do with my point of view.
>
>Sure it does. Let's break it down. You said:
>
>"I can't believe that people are actually offended by this stuff"
>
>Implicit in that statement is the fact that "you" are *not* offended by this stuff. That's your point of view, right?
>
>I asked:
>
>"You honestly can't believe that someone else has a different view from your own?"
>
>Completely relevant, I believe.
>
>>Has to do with the ability I have to ignore things at a certain level. I don't see anyone crossing lines they shouldn't cross.
>
>Maybe you should have said, "I can't believe that people can't just ignore things at a certain level like I can", or something like that.
>
>>I doubt I would be as blunt as John. But I would like to see the mag make a leap foward.
>
>Same here.
>
>>Political Correctness has gone wayyyy overboard.
>
>I prefer Professional Courtesy, and I think it's wayyyy overdue.