John,

>chances are, the person who ran the code did it on something other than NT.

Either that, or only on existing drives.

>the person charged with the responsibility of testing the code FAILED TO HIS/HER JOB.

How differs this from what I've said in another message?

>you cannot lump in the sub-par work of Miriam Liskin as production related problems.

Can you point me to the message where I'm talking about Miriam Liskins?

>I suspect you are trying to spin this in such a way as to deflect attention from the past/present FPA editorial process..

Wrong.

Christof