John,

>We will leave it with the fact that you support some sort of age bias...
>
>Thanks for clearing up your position David...

I have not stated my position yet, so stop putting *your* words into my mouth. I've told you before that I don't appreciate that. I will let the *facts* lead me to a conclusion. It's the only logical way to investigate the question.

>Let's see, during the process of hiring somebody, it is illegal to ask the age of the applicant... It is illegal to discriminate against somebody on the basis of their age...

Once again, where in the world did you get *hiring discrimination* or any kind of discrimination from anything that I have posted? Facts, please.

>Do you really want to go down this road with me...???

I am concerned only with the original paragraphs I posted, the answers to the age question, and the conclusions that I *may* eventually draw *after* analyzing the data.

You can try to lead this discussion down as many back roads as you wish, but that's not the destination I set out for. That's *very* plain from my posts in this thread, if you care to base your statements on *facts*.