Your so-called facts, and I use the word facts loosely, won't support any conclusion worth putting stock in ...

>John,
>
>>BTW, your survey can be described as anything BUT scientific...
>
>Already bracing yourself for the conclusion that you *think* the facts will support? I'm still waiting for the results.
>
>I never described this survey as scientific. I think I have called it *informal*, and have structured it in a way that should eliminate it being weighted in any direction other than toward the 50 most active posters in the last 7 days.
>
>Among those 50 are a *very* wide range of ages, opinions, personalities, etc. As long as the result is qualified by the means of conducting the survey, it should be valid for looking at general trends and statistical distribution.