Paul,

>I hope you didn't take my original message as an attack on you because in hindsight I feel as though that's how you took it. I intended the message to point out to your critics that they were trying to dispell your surveys validity by siting certain instances that fell on one side of the fence or the other (whichever helped prove their point). I fully understand that you are currently in the process of gathering facts to come to an informed decision in the matter. I know I wasn't on your original list, but if it assists you in any way I'm 23 (24 on Apr 13)

It would take a lot more than that to qualify as an attack :-) . Thanks for backing up and making sure -- that shows some class.