>>Nope. Without us, "they" would be dead. The least an adminstration and users could do is work out an agreement together, then have the users abide contently by their own rules.
>
>How do you propose that that be done without filling the UT with hundreds of messages debating various words back and forth? Organize a campaign to get people to email Michel or a designated sysop? Form a committee? Or just let them know your concerns as an individual?

Thus the futility of setting indefensible *rules*.

Self-policing really works much better, IME and NSHO.