I have no neurochemical energy. That's the problem. Had this been Monday, I probably would have figured it out on my own. As it is, I'm lucky I have nothing more taxing than writing up a document to do yet tonight because my brain is mush. I did finally manage to find my one remaining clue and figure out what you're telling me. All I can do is hang my head in shame and promise not to ask any more questions until I've gotten some rest. :)

Thanks,

Michelle


>That's correct - when you macro-expand, what you get back is parsed into the context of the current line under execution. What's the difference between:
>
>[O'Malley]
>
>and
>
>O'Malley
>
>The original message noted that the second was used where the value being tested was not a string; what's the difference between:
>
>[42]
>
>and
>
>42
>
>Expend some neurochemical energy and look at the problem.