John,

How can you expect anyone to believe that you mean no harm when your previous posts scream just the opposite?

You can't have it both ways, dude!

If you want to be part of a constructive conversation, then you'll need to keep your comments and ideas constructive, otherwise you'll be talking to yourself! <s>

Hey, what happened to the 'lesson' your wife taught you not too long ago? You know, the one about the person who complained all the time ending up with nobody to talk to... I thought that convinced you that there are better ways to conduct yourself... Boy, that sure didn't last long did it?

Anyway, I'm going to take you out of my twit filter and give you another chance, but if I can't learn from your posts (like in the 'good old days') then it's filter-city for you! (and don't worry, you won't be alone there)

Have a nice...


>You would be incorrect in my motives...
>
>First off, I am attempting to include a prominate individual in what is turning out to be a good conversation. What is the harm in attempting to include her? I am soliciting her opinion. Again, what is wrong with that????
>
>
>
>
>
>>John,
>>
>>I think, it's too easy to see that you are not interested in a real constructive discussion, but rather in belittling Tamar, because you know all the answers at forehand.
>>
>>John.... it's time to stop this one one man show....
>>
>>Walter,
>>
>>
>>>There is an interesting discussion on Remote View's vs SQL Pass Through....
>>
>>>As somebody who has given many Devcon sessions on SQL, the use of views,etc, I was wondering if you had any insights on this topic.
>>
>>>Specifically, comparing T-SQL to VFP SQL and the use of stored procedures on the server as opposed to rendering SQL from the client, are the issues surrounding Remote Views, etc - what is your opinion?
>>
>>>An interesting an valuable debate is going on now. Somebody with your considereable SQL experience would be of value to this debate...