>What a description :) Got it. Thanks.
>Here is my twit list :-)

Hmmm...since I'm replying, you just didn't meet the 'standards' for inclusion on mine! Seriously, you're one of the good guys; it'd be a real loss, both for your technical insight and good humor, not to see your posts.

To continue the thought and philosophy of twit filtration, if you don't mind, the implementation philosophy is that it's as much a control on my urges to respond in near-automatic and perhaps unpleasant fashion. I want to be a good member of the community, and part of the rules here read "Thou shalt not flame even those most deserving of immolation". I'm not always given to obey this rule; for whatever reason, patterns of response emerge over time, in many cases to personalities, which is what the twit filter helps, in some cases, to topics (software pirates occupy an evolutionary niche somewhere between algae and used car salesmen, and I'll in no way apologise for believing that piracy is theft, pure, simple and inexcusable) where the twit filter doesn't help. I'm more likely to cross the line with personal attack than with reaction to a topic. The twit filter is a good thing.