>> The problem in the example in the thread is that the condition is not correctly parantherised (does this word exist in English? :)).
>
> Vlad,
>
>So, based on your comments above, the removal of the parens would fix the problem.

As already said, I made a mistake in checking parens... :(

>I may have removed them because I couldn't understand them, but in doing that it would fix the problem. <g>

This is weird. I never had or saw this problem before. (IE: correct parens always worked fine, no matter if there were useless pairs od parens.)

Vlad