My point is the fact that much of Miriam's article is technically inaccurate, does not go into sufficient detail, etc.... I thought my comments were pretty self-explanatory..
>John, I've read this twice and don't understand your point. :)
>
>Maybe a better question would be does anyone really read FPA for
>technical merit?
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only