>>Maybe a better question would be does anyone really read FPA for
>>technical merit?
>
>One point is subscribers deserve the best value for what they pay for. I would say most readers who are not familiar with a particular topic take what is published as factual, accurate and thorough just because of the FPA name and the Author's name.
>
>The sad reality is I bet at least 1 person will jump John about his posting this instead of debating the technical validity of this critique.
Guys, I was kidding. I think John is right on target.
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only