David,
>Doug,
>
>>If I'm uderstanding the gereral gist of our discussion it's all about speed, wouldn't you say? We're just speculating on how best to boost performance.
>
>Actually, I think we're just engaging in some pseudo-relevant techno-babble. :-)
Shhh.. This is real work David! <g>
Seriously, I really would like to see a faster series of products from MSFT. I gripe every time I open Outlook on my PIII 500Mhx, 128MB machine. It taks WAY TOO LONG in my opinion and I wonder to myself, "Where are the alleged increases in performance all this new hardware is supposed to provide?"
There really are days I want to go straight to Unix and get some speed boosts and get away from a GUI that cannot seem to continue to both grow/mature and remain as svelte as I'd like.
>
>>PS - BTW, I've really enjoyed this. Thanks!!
>
>Same here. We must never cease to dream and innovate, even while wrestling with reality.
Best,
DD
Best,
DD
A man is no fool who gives up that which he cannot keep for that which he cannot lose.
Everything I don't understand must be easy!
The difficulty of any task is measured by the capacity of the agent performing the work.