John,

>>>
>I don't think it's appropriate for me to discuss internal magazine matters in a public forum. If you look back, you'll find that I've never done so, regardless of who started the thread
><<
>
>Just to reiterate, bad content getting published is NOT an internal magazine issue. You and Advisor owe the readership an explanation for how this happens. For too many months, this has been the status quo. The time has long passed for you to offer up an explanation. Whether it comes from you or Advisor, I don't care. The readership has a right to know...
>
>Do you not agree with this???

Bad content is not your business either. Other than to point out to others the how's and whys and so forth which you have every right to do and which many of us read in order to learn - after wading through your relentless pursuit of non technical issues. Advisor has every right to print their magazine any way they choose, with any content they choose and as poorly as they choose, even if you don't like it.

How Advisor Publications runs their business really is none of your business.

I say that with the greatest respect for your technical acumen. I have no doubt that you have very good technical issues to gripe at them about. What they choose to do in response is none of your dang business!

You can only choose for yourself. They can only choose for themselves. You have every right to not like what they print. They have every right to print something you do not like.

What about this can you not accept!?!?!

Everone knows that you have a gripe with them.

Have you confused your need to be right with their right to be wrong?

Best,

DD