Hello Ed,

>>John, I've read this twice and don't understand your point. :)
>>
>>Maybe a better question would be does anyone really read FPA for
>>technical merit?
>
>David, the fact is, yes - in many cases, FPA is the only contact with the developer community that's available to many people using VFP or older FP versions, since it's the only widely-advertised magazine devoted to VFP that they're aware of.

My comment was tongue in cheek. As you point out I think many read it for its technical merit (myself included) and that is why I thought John's post was so good. I was trying to stimulate additional conversation.

Talk to you later.