>So, using your logic, when presenting conceptual or introductory material it is OK to be inaccurate....
>
>You see, when people say they write on a conceptual level, it is double-speak for "Well, I have read about this stuff, but I have never actually used it".
>
>What separates novices from conceptual people. The novice is on page 1, the conceptual person is on page 2...< s >...
>
>Folks don't need concept articles. They need articles that shows them how to use this stuff. If people want theory, there are a plethora of books on the market, few of which, show folks how to use this stuff. That is what techncial magazines are for.
>

Whoa John! you're twisting things again - speculating about my logic.. sheesh.

I did not make any comments on the accuracy of the article, so don't read too much into that.

As far as I am concerned, any broad generalization you're making in this reply is entirely your opinion (or any other post for that matter). I wasn't born with a knowledge base so when I don't know I read.