I see them as compliments as opposed to substitutes. Articles allow for the illustration of the applying of an idea, a mini-case study if you will. Of course, this does not mean an article that is largely conceptual is of no value. I think it is safe to say that as a matter of course, that while we can get our theory from a variety of sources, the practical application of that theory is most readily available in magazine/web articles, and if you take it a bit further, online forums and discussion groups..

>IMHO, this is why books are much more valuable as a resource than articles. In the context of a book, the "why" and the "how" can be mapped out thoroughly.
>
>>Yes, we agree here 100%. Theory by itself is rarely effectice. Theory coupled with practical, not contrived examples, is the best combination...