> >If there is no such way, does anyone know of a workaround, besides > defining the properties before loading the class? > > Personally, I prefer to have class property-array as a place to store > undetermined number of 'properties' (array is resizeble, isn't it?). Yes, but that's exactly the reason we use properties instead of arrays - array members are accessed by index number, and properties by name. I have had a similar question for adding methods to a form programmatically (from, say, a builder or a conversion routine), and have written to m$.foxwish (or whatever the name was), and got nothing back, unless a serial form message is something. I think the whole idea was to have properties (pre)designed, and that adding properties at runtime could lead to... er, unpredictable results. Besides, checking every time if a property exists is a kind of toothache. See I've been a nice boy and didn't ask you what do you need it for :)