>>The Authors state:
>>"Because of Outlook’s varied history, the examples in this chapter have been
>>tested only with Outlook 2000. They may well work with earlier versions, but
>>we’re making no promises on that front."
>>
>>Sorry! Maybe a simple upgrade????
>>John
>
>John, thanks for the reply. With my luck, it figures that this would be one of the changes that (apparently) was made between versions.
>
>Our clients unfortunately are very fearful of upgrades (you know the type ;-P ) and were VERY adamant about staying, for example, w/ Outlook 98 (since "it's so much more 'proven' than 2000").
>
>Perhaps we'll bundle 2000 (with the appropriate licenses of course) in with our application or something ... sometimes you have to force the users into something ...... even if you hope not to originally.
>
>There are many other small things for which 2000 seems so much better suited (of course), but this so far seems to be the biggest.
>
>If possible, I'd still rather find a (relatively) "quick" way around this in 98.
>
>Again, thanks for your help.
>
>And, as always, if anyone has any further insight or 'possible solutions' for Outlook 98, I'd appreciate it.
>
>Have a good day.
>
Jared,

If you want some "ammo" for upgrading, look at "What's New for Microsoft Outlook 2000 Developers" by Jim Groves. It's a technical article in the MSDN Library.