Doug,

>>Yes, the legislature does make law. However, the courts still have the final say. Any law (or other piece of legislation) can be challenged in court and ultimately be overturned by the court.
>
>And the legislature can overturn the court with a 2/3 majority via the ammendment process.
>
>Very very hard to do but do-able.

And that's true too (both of 'em< s >).

>>
>>>>From my POV the process should be to challenge the applicability of Sherman in the courts first. Then, provided it found to be inapplicable revise it accordingly.
>>>
>>>From where I sit if someone wants to challenge a law like this I think it's great and they should so do but I guess I still think that at the end of the day the legislature is where this battle should take place.
>>
>>Yes, but the legislature doesn't have the final say as I mentioned above.
>
>And, as I said it does have the ability to overturn court rulings.
>
>So there.. *bg* Nyahh nyahh *rof'l*

Blattttt! (sticks tongue out at DD)

>Seriously, you could also have one court overturning another court as well. It's not so straightforward, wouldn't you agree?
>

Absolutely.
>>
>>>
>>Always the wit, eh, Doug?:-)
>
>Nahh.. I only get one try every couple of days and then my brain wears out. <g>
>
>BTW I've very much enjoyed this discussion. If I ever had hankering to become a lawyer (I have actually) I'd want to go into Constitutional Law I'd think.
>
I've enjoyed it too, but I have no desire to go into law. Besides I'm way too old.

>PS - What level in Hell did Dante assign the lawyers to? *bg*

Bottom, third door on the left< bg >