Did I?
What I was trying to say was MS didn't fit the textbook definition of a monopoly. I wasn't saying they didn't enjoy a competitive advantage over other software vendors. Competitive advantage does not constitute a monopoly.
Its hard to say if consumers would be better off with more competition because MS products are widely available and competively priced. That fact is not characteristic of a monopoly.
Charlie
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only