>Yes, this is also true sometimes. There are shareable things as well as non-shareable things. Am I right?
>
>Vlad
>
If non shareable things are what they are because it would take too much time to explain them, that would be acceptable, otherwise it would be shortsighted, especially in a assieged language like Foxpro. Face it, by collaborating, we increase the chances of survival of Foxpro.

The only other reason to keep secrets from each other would be competition, but is this a relevant consideration, in these global world wide times?

Marc