>>>>>>We have a field which is set as Numeric type say Amount N(10,4). Value of
>>>>>>which was derived from different variables and fields (n1+n2+n3, etc.).
>>>>>>Somewhere in the module, it is clear that Amount has a value of 16.0000 being
>>>>>>shown in the debugger, but if we try to make use of INT(Amount), it gives us
>>>>>>15. Trying to do the same procedure in the command window but this time using
>>>>>>variables, it produces the correct result. Is there a hidden anomaly of
>>>>>>using a Numeric type?
>>>>>
>>>>>As mentioned by several others, the answer here is yes. As suggested in Q258998, you might be able to use ROUND(nAmount, 0) instead of INT(nAmount) to get the value you expect.
>>>>
>>>>Garrett,
>>>>
>>>>In this case yes:
>>>>Round(16.0000,2) gives 16
>>>>Int(16.0000) should be 16 right? but it gives 15 which is attributed to what others are saying.
>>>>
>>>>What if?
>>>>Round(16.5555,0) gives 17
>>>>Int(16.5555) gives 16
>>>>
>>>>We just want to get the Integer value.
>>>>
>>>>What is the best alternative data type over numeric type?
>>>
>>>
>>>Wait a minute, you put in INT(16.0000) and it gives you 15? Even when you use the constant 16.0000? Or am I mis understanding you. I get 16 on my machine...
>>
>>Try to read the original post at your convenience. The problem doesn't occur in the command window.
>
>Well, actually it does:
>
>

>x = 3.999999999999999
>z = x * 4
>? z        && Prints 16.000000000000000
>? int(z)   && Prints 15
>

Ok! I thought it applies only on fields.