Rick,

You could run your own Chi-Square test on the results to see if you are happy with the data. Be warned though that using -1 as the seed may result in less psuedorandom numbers because it's seeded from the system clock and I don't know if it's guaranteed to be a decent prime seed number.

>Is anyone aware of reliability checks of FoxPro's RAND() function to determine whether it adequately
>simulates random numbers on the interval (0,1)? Thanks.