>>I agree totally. I think most PUTM members would feel that the annual membership to this site is likely one of the best investments that can be made.

>What about in countries where its not feasible to pay that much? The point is, you shouldn't make someone pay for a basic funtion that was free without any warning at all, its not right.

Wow. For some reason I thought for sure you would chirp in for the site's creator regardless of what or how he did it Mike. My agreeing with you aside I respect you for being willing to offer your differing opinion as a PUTM. This site is actually worth alot more than 10 or so bucks a month. Maybe 10x or more, only the individual can say. I do know I've felt like a creep not joining yet but there are circumstances which I do not want to go into. Still I will support this site with the membership fee asap even if there were no PUTM features and it was a voluntary fee. Heck, your replies alone are worth the measley $10 bucks or so a month. The no warning was and is a bad idea. I get the feeling we are on private property and lost that 'holy ground' touchy feel. Thanks Mike for speaking your mind