Amen to all pro-UT posts. I'm MORE than happy to pay for this. It is well worth the $$$ (American or Canadian) and keeping it running takes a lot of work.

Most of us get paid for our efforts (don't YOU Mark?).

Why should Michel charge for his efforts?

I don't think the charge is onerous, by any means. And if you are doing this for a living, it's tax deductible in the U.S. Why not give Michel the money instead of the government?


>Michel,
>
>I believe that adding more value to premium products is the right way to grow membership. I also believe that coercing people by removing features you've always provided at no charge is the wrong way to grow membership. It's especially inappropriate to do it with no warning and no grace period.