Barbara,

At least it is interesting how this subject has morphed into a totally different topic!
Exactly how life works!

Cheers (to both Michel and Barbara, as well as to all the others who were in on it at the start!)
Jim N

>>>Referring to your comment below, do you think it might give us more flexibility *IF* Michel were to also INCLUDE the "To" person in the list, WITH A SELECTION ALREADY INDICATED, so that we could optionally DE-select that one and select the Originator (or whomever else we desired)? In other words, the "To" might change at Send time.
>>
>>Just take the appropriate message to reply to. Clicking on the map and selecting the one you want to reply to will give you this ability.
>
>The problem I've run into is that you want the information to go to person A, but you REALLY want to include the information that person B wrote in his message. Now that I can always include the person I want to see the message, it's just a matter of phrasing what I write to not make it look like I'm denigrating someone's knowledge but am trying to ADD to it.
>
>For example, I'm addressing this to Michel, but including Jim from the check boxes, since it refers to his comments.
>
>Barbara