>The problem I've run into is that you want the information to go to person A, but you REALLY want to include the information that person B wrote in his message. Now that I can always include the person I want to see the message, it's just a matter of phrasing what I write to not make it look like I'm denigrating someone's knowledge but am trying to ADD to it.
>
>For example, I'm addressing this to Michel, but including Jim from the check boxes, since it refers to his comments.

I agree.

I don't want to make to many feature from the reply form. Some people already has some problem to understand why we need to forward a reply to someone or why those checkboxes are there. For now, I want to keep as is. I will reconsider that later on.