>Mike,
>
>>Here's what I think it boils down to: VS7 will have a strong emphasis on the Universal Runtime (URT) (did they rename it to "Common Language Runtime" when I wasn't looking?). This involves the usage of the following terms that you'll hear bandied about:
>>Managed C++
>>C#
>>ASP+
>>All three depend on the URT.
>
>And so does VB7. No more VBRUN is what I'm hearing -- it will run on the CLR also.
VBRUN or CLR or what ever.... As long as it is transparent to VFP 6.0 running on Win95 or 98SE then we don't care.
Otherwise we will be staying with VFP6 and Win9X for quit a while. It's getting too expensive to do this upgrade stuff
all the time. We only finished about a year ago a 1.5+Million$ hardware plus licensing cost upgrade from Win3.11 to
Win95. Gong back so soon to the taxpayers to ask for another 2M$ to do it again would get us laughed out or fired.
Nebraska Dept of Revenue