Evan,

>>4. Multiple data engine capability. This is a flexibility I'd like to see in VFP but we'd give up some speed.
>
>Not sure you mean by this. What kind of connection to data?

Well, with Delphi you can 'attach' one of a couple-three data engines into your projects. Interbase, dBASE, etc, or none, depending on your needs. The engine is essentially just another component, like a checkbox on a form. You add it if you need it.

I like the concept.

>
>>5. You can access both CORBA and COM objects. Not many will find this useful but it is IMO important enough to mention.
>>
>>5a. (See above) Here's a scenario I find attractive: SQL backend, COM (VB, VFP, Delphi, etc) middle tier and Delphi front end. Speed on the desktop, speed in between and speed (some) and security on the back end.
>>
>>6. The possibility of having a front end on Linux with perhaps a Linux-based COM middle tier server is very attractive to me. This would be a cool "bridge' for VFP programmers to open up all the Linux market for us..
>
>I think Linux on the desktop is not much of a threat, but Linux servers are a major competitor to NT servers... this would allow a developers to hedge their bets.

I'd agree that Linux servers will be the strength of Linux and that this is a definite threat to MS's hegemony. What are the recent number ? Something like 40% of new servers are Linux; particularly mail and firewall types.

Still, with the recent announcement (yesterday?) that the Star software's source would be released I can only think that that software will benefit as Linux did. And since it's free and, for the most part, can read MS formats... Well, once Linux's graphics capabilities match that of Windows I'd think MS is going to get some real competition.

Millions and millions and millions of ants can kill an elephant.

Best,

DD