>>CON
>---
>>1. Borland.
>
>>2. Borland.
>
>>3. Borland. <g>
>
>>4. Will the product survive? I think it will but who knows? Look at dBASE.. Ugh.
>
>>5. It is technically a great product but needs a real dose of marketing.
>
>
>>Best,
>
>
>Doug, on your list of CONs, replace 1, 2, 3 with MICROSOFT and you would be talking about VFP.

Andy,

<g>

Well, i suppose I'd have to disagree with you on that score. Mind you, I would also like to see MSFT do more but given the nature of the product I don't see it in the cards. Am I pessimistic about FoxPro? Nahh.. It's a stable product and as has been pointed out by others VFP apps are going to stick arouns like COBOL apps. The xBase language IMO really is the COBOL of the PCs.

Now, why do I take that position I do? Simple... Where's Clipper, dBASE, Arago, etc..?? They're essentially history but Foxpro is still very much alive and kicking!!!. In other words, I guess what I'm thinking is that unless Microsoft had purchased FoxPro we'd all be using VB, Delphi or some other language. I think MSFT has kept xBase alive rather than killing it.

Why? Well, where are the other products we all knew and loved? Gone...

I do not think that the nature of xBase will ever lend itself to a mass appeal like VB. I do think, however, that by placing VFP into the middle tier "arena" that MSFT has ensured it a long long life. There's no other product with the ability to build COM objects and that has the speed VFP does. It's a compelling combination and I for one am glad to see it take that place..

No rose colored glasses. Just trying to be realistic. I'd very much appreciate having someone convince me otherwise. I know just how wrong I can be but I've been around enough to think that this just might be the case here...

Best,.

DD